Forensic psychiatry in the United States military.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Members of the U.S. military and their families represent a unique subsection of the American culture. The U.S. Constitution, federal law, and military regulations establish guidance for the conduct of service members during peacetime and wartime. This same hierarchy of law and regulation sets forth the legal rights and directs the provision of medical care for service members and their families. The fact that the military population is concurrently subject to a body of military law, as well as to the broader guidelines of the civilian sector, creates distinct roles for the military forensic psychiatrist. An understanding of the medical and legal framework in which the military forensic psychiatrist operates will facilitate the interactions of the civilian expert witness with the military justice system. In this report, the legal issues most relevant to the practice of forensic psychiatry in the military are discussed. In addition, the roles and responsibilities for psychiatrists specifically trained in aspects of military medical and mental health law are identified.
منابع مشابه
Veterans and the justice system: the next forensic frontier.
On most days in the United States, stories appear in the media related to American soldiers who are deployed overseas. We know that the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan are like none other that our soldiers have experienced. With multiple tours of duty and exposure to events that may involve suicide bombers and improvised explosive devices, these soldiers return with an array of experiences an...
متن کاملThe military insanity defense.
This article describes the military insanity defense. The success of the litigated insanity defense is explored through the number of insanity acquittals over a 28-month period. A questionnaire distributed to all United States Army psychiatrists provided information on the number of forensic evaluations performed, the number of not criminally responsible (NCR) opinions made, and the disposition...
متن کاملRe: "Lies and coercion: why psychiatrists should not participate in police and intelligence interrogations".
Police interrogators routinely use deceptive techniques to obtain confessions from criminal suspects. The United States Executive Branch has attempted to justify coercive interrogation techniques in which physical or mental pain and suffering may be used during intelligence interrogations of persons labeled unlawful combatants. It may be appropriate for law enforcement, military, or intelligenc...
متن کاملA Review and Analysis of the United States' Aggressive Intentions and Security Threats following the Islamic Revolution of Iran
Having reviewed and evaluated the aggressive intentions security threats in United States' behavior against the Islamic Republic of Iran, this article puts the greatest emphasis on aggressive intention especially "national security doctrine" and mentioning some of its characteristics so by categorizing different approaches toward national security clarify some of vague aspects of this concept. ...
متن کاملComparative Study of the Educational Program of Military Nursing in Iran, USA, India
Background and Aim: In order to promote military nursing education in Iran, it is necessary to conduct comparative studies and use the strategies experienced in universities in other countries. The present study has a descriptive and comparative comparison of military nursing education programs in three countries: Iran, the United States and India. Methods: A comparative and descriptive-analyti...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
دوره 26 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1998